Month: April 2008

Texans elected to lead Southwestern trustees; administrative salaries fully disclosed

FORT WORTH?John Mark Caton of Fairview was elected chairman of the trustees at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary during their April 8-9 meeting. Caton has been pastor of Cottonwood Creek Baptist Church in Allen since 1995 and earned the master of divinity degree and Ph.D. from Southwestern. He previously was trustee vice-chairman.

Geoffrey Kolander of Austin was elected vice-chairman. He is vice president and general counsel of Citizens, an Austin-based insurance holding company, and a member of Hyde Park Baptist Church. Re-elected as secretary is Harlan Lee, a Phoenix restaurant owner and member of North Phoenix Baptist Church.

During the informal trustee forum held prior to the official plenary sessions, thetrustees received “a report from the president where he provided his annual disclosure of his compensation information and entertained questions related to it and the same information for the rest of the seminary’s senior administration,” according to a Southwestern news release.

In his comment to Southwestern’s reporter, McClain said, “Since Southern Baptists expect that their entities supported by the Cooperative Program will be governed with integrity and accountability, I am glad the salary of the president of Southwestern has been fully and willingly disclosed to all of the trustees of the seminary, even though Dr. Patterson has refused an increase in compensation since his arrival in 2003.”

Trustees approved a 2008-’09 budget of nearly $37 million, representing a 2.4 percent increase. Initially, the business affairs committee considered a proposal to increase the budget by 5.8 percent, but asked that it be reduced in light of economic indicators. Chairman Jack S. Smith of Dallas praised the business administration vice president, Greg Kingry, as “a self-starter” who quickly responded to the concerns of the committee.

The board encouraged the institutional advancement office to consider recruiting and training volunteers to assist them in fundraising and endowment growth. Trustees will be surveyed to determine how much they wish to be involved in the effort.

Newly elected faculty recommended by the academic administration committee included Herbert Bateman and Aaron Son as professors of New Testament, and Laura Zettler to teach homemaking in the College at Southwestern. Bateman formerly taught at Moody Bible College and Grace Theological Seminary. Son comes from a teaching position at Dallas Baptist University. Zettler taught at the University of Alabama and directed children’s ministries for Calvary Baptist Church in Tuscaloosa, Ala.

Three Texas couples will be honored next fall with the L.R. Scarborough Award, as approved by the board. They include Dr. and Mrs. James “Jim” W. Richards of Keller. Richards has served as the SBTC’s executive director since its founding. Also named for the honor are Dr. and Mrs. John Earl Seelig of Fort Worth and Dr. and Mrs. John “Jack” W. MacGorman of Fort Worth.

Recommendations of the bylaws and policies committee were approved to strike one article to reflect a previously amended trustee committee structure, and allowing the executive committee the option of a teleconference as a cost-savings measure for their required meeting between semi-annual trustee sessions.

Dembski: ‘Expelled’ exposes hypocrisy

FORT WORTH—A controversial documentary released nationwide on April 18 could foster a cultural shift “equivalent to the fall of the Berlin Wall,” says William Dembski, research professor of philosophy at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary.

The seminary hosted a private screening of “Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed” (PG) in early March. In the film, host Ben Stein tracks down scholars who have been “expelled” by the academic community for their support of intelligent design (ID), a research program that flies in the face of Darwinism. Dembski is featured in the documentary.

“This film exposes the hypocrisy of an academic and cultural elite who pretend that they value freedom of inquiry and expression but in fact suppress it when it clashes with their deeply held materialistic convictions,” Dembski said. 

He and other proponents of ID have suggested the universe shows signs of having been designed by an intelligent being.

Many fields of study within modern science involve intelligent design, including archeology, forensics and the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI), Dembski said. An archeologist, for example, examines the evidence—such as a curiously shaped stone—to determine whether it might be the product of a human intelligence.

“These sciences, however, are uncontroversial because any intelligence detected through them could be an ‘evolved’ intelligence,” Dembski said. “Most of the action with ID, on the other hand, centers in biology, so that any intelligence involved with the emergence of living things is likely to be an ‘unevolved’ intelligence. ID therefore challenges materialistic theories of evolution, such as Darwinism.”

Unlike biblical creationism, ID does not begin with the Genesis account of creation, nor do its proponents attempt to describe the nature of the intelligence that designed the universe. Despite this fact, Dembski noted, “ID is friendly to Christian theism in a way that materialistic forms of evolution never have been.”

“One of the biggest obstacles to people coming to Christ in Western culture is the impression that science has disproved the Bible and Christianity,” he said. “ID therefore helps to correct this false impression by showing that our best science supports belief in a higher intelligence responsible for life. ID does not give you the Christian God as such, but it puts you in the right ballpark.”

Dembski’s trials at Baylor University?which describes itself as “the world’s largest Baptist university”?from 1999-2005 are not documented in the film. Among other things, he drew the wrath of the science, philosophy and religion departments early in his tenure there when it was learned that he was heading up an ID think tank on campus. Dembski’s role in the documentary is mainly as someone explaining Intelligent Design for the audience.

Dembski told the Southern Baptist TEXAN that those who most need to see the movie are “parents of children in high school or college, as well as those children themselves, who may think that the biological sciences are a dispassionate search for truth about life but many of whose practitioners see biology, especially evolutionary biology, as an ideological weapon to destroy faith in God.”

Robert Marks, who holds the title of “distinguished professor of engineering” at Baylor University, also appears in the film as one of the “expelled” academics. Although he remains at Baylor as a tenured professor, Baylor officials last year forced Marks to return grant money it received related to ID research and forced his ID research website to an off-campus server.

“I sat there and I laughed,” Marks said of his reaction watching the film. “I laughed because I have seen this atheistic, big-science mafia squad come out and kill the careers of many of my friends. Guillermo Gonzalez, who I knew at the University of Washington. Richard Sternberg, who I recently met. And to see their motivation and goals so clearly exposed in a Ben Stein sort of dry humor was incredible. I really, really enjoyed the movie. I think it is going to have an enormous impact. I hope it does.”

Information on the film can be found at expelledthemovie.com. The TEXAN has an archived interview with one of the film’s executive producers, Logan Craft. The interview is accessible at texanonline.net and was first posted on Jan. 28.

No other gospel

For the time will come when they will not tolerate sound doctrine, but according to their own desires, will accumulate teachers for themselves because they have an itch to hear something new. ?2 Timothy 4:3 (HCSB)

Give Oprah Winfrey a break. Through hard work and intelligence she has built an empire that makes her the queen of all media. Her name on a product or idea guarantees some level of success. At this point in her life, people jump when she says “frog.” That kind of influence leads many people to believe their wisdom in one endeavor should transfer into any realm they can imagine.

Her latest imagination is that she has religious ideas that will benefit all in range of her voice and pen. It’s only natural. She’s as wrong as I would be if I invented or bought into some man-made religion. No more and no less. And while we are right to note the errors in the ideas of a teacher, as we have with Joel Osteen, The Secret, New Age gurus like Deepak Chopra, and so on, let’s not forget the sin of those who nod like bobble heads every time someone says something in print or on screen. The problem of false teaching is as much one of demand as it is of supply.

And yes, the problem is sin as well as deception. When I read 2 Timothy 4:3 I think of our neighbors accumulating best-selling books on spirituality. The latest from Marianne Williamson (one of Oprah’s gurus) goes on the night table in the stack with “Your Best Life Now,” “The Purpose-Driven Life,” and a Bible. Maybe we’ll take an idea from each book until we come up with a spiritual smoothie that comforts and affirms all we like but only condemns mean people. Sure, it’s toxic, but we chose the ingredients and we drank it. As Paul says, our deception, our customized collection of teachers, is “according to [our] own desires.”

The apologists we interviewed and quoted for our special report on false teaching in this issue agreed that we all must be more discerning. It’s critical that we know the gospel, and the Bible that contains it so that we can recognize counterfeits. I agree. The question of getting the large number of us from where we are to being motivated to study and apply God’s Word to our world is harder to answer. We’re not nearly there. Until we stop loving some aspect or another of the lie, we’re not even in the same building with discernment.

Here’s a selection of what the Bible says about the problem. We, who lack wisdom (or understanding or discernment), are described in James as never asking for it or being too unstable and double-minded to receive it. In 2 Timothy 4:6-7 those ready victims of false teachers are said to be weighed down by sin and their impulses. They are also said to be unable to recognize even the truth they hear. Romans 1:25, after describing a horrible decline into sin, says that this slide starts when we exchange the truth of God for a lie. Strong words, and they attribute our gullibility to rebellion against God.

And this same rebellion rightly describes the false teachers, although they bear even a heavier responsibility. They are conceited (1 Timothy 6:4) to think that their distortion of the gospel can ever be sufficient for any good purpose. False teachers are rebellious, empty talkers and deceivers (Titus 1:10). They are men of a depraved mind (2 Timothy 4:8 and Romans 1:28). In his harshest condemnation, Paul says, in Galatians 1:8 (NKJV), “But even if we, or an angel from heaven, preach any other gospel to you than what we have preached to you, let him be accursed.” Accursed? In looking at the word more closely, we see that he is turning such a person over to God for condemnation of his actions.

Does it seem like overkill to condemn someone who merely, though wrongly, wants to make people feel better about things? Are we also willing to drop our condemnation of people who impersonate medical personnel? How about if someone you believe is a physician tells you the pain in your side is gas when it’s actually appendicitis? Spiritual truth is more important than medical truth but we don’t act like we believe it.

Modern false teachers lead some to believe that they are alright with God based on their works?the lie of manmade religion from the beginning. Others tell folks that their poverty or sickness is a sure sign that they are bad or faithless. This is a negative version of the first error. In this one, you could be good enough but you just aren’t. New Age religion teaches that all religions are the same. You can worship a demon (Hinduism) and it’s all the same as worshipping a tree (Wicca) or an impersonal life force (Buddhism) or the God of Abraham and Paul who condemns all those forms of idolatry?it’s all the same. Surely the horrible deception of this is Satanic?worthy of condemnation.

False teachers like this stuff because it sells, and maybe because it comforts them also. We like it because it empowers us by freeing us from a personal God who, uninvited, involves himself in our daily affairs. It’s just the age-old rebellion of Satan dressed up and pushed to the top of the best-seller list.

“Gospel,” of course, means “good news.” And there can be only one. While we often love the idea of a new take on the old story, the new version can’t be rightly called good news. When we go from revealed truth to some novel imagination we also go from certainty to “I hope so.” We might like the appearance of tolerance in the “many ways to some god” language, but it throws us back on our own opinions or those of another.

I will disappoint myself and be wrong about the most mundane of matters, thus my opinion is suspect. The opinions of a celebrity preacher or media queen tarnish with temper tantrums, drunk driving arrests, unguarded words, or some other foible common to mortal folk. Whatever it is that offends us, our new and shiny authority figure will eventually fall prey to that temptation.

All this is Satan’s way. After we’ve pledged allegiance to some old, but newly packaged, lie, he lets us build our worldview around it and scoff at the narrow fools who believe God. Then he opens door number three and there’s nothing there. We despair and embrace some less religious religion more absurd than anything we ever thought we’d believe. Hell begins in the here and now.

But so does Heaven. As we live according to revealed will of our creator, we’re doing what he’s determined will work in the world he made. Through God’s son, Jesus, and only through him, we can have spiritual peace now and eternal life starting now. That’s the good news. And there is no substitute for the real thing.

Iniciativa Hispana al Día

Estos son días excitantes para el Departamento de la Iniciativa Hispana y Ministerios Étnicos. Nuestro ministerio continúa creciendo debido a nuestros esfuerzos de apoyar los ministerios de nuestras iglesias.

Para mantenernos al corriente de la obra, le damos una grata bienvenida a la SBTC a Philip Levant, el nuevo asistente de ministerios. Philip estudia en el Seminario Bautista Teológico del Sudoeste en Fort Worth. Está casado con Patricia y tienen un hijito, Lucas, de siete meses.

Estamos trabajando en los eventos del 2008 que han sido intencionalmente diseñados para fortalecer y apoyar a nuestras iglesias y familias hispanas. Estos eventos son como siguen:

La Conferencia Cristiana para la Mujer de Hoy que será el 11 y 12 de julio. El lema para este año es “Una Mujer de Excelencia”, basado en Tito 2:7. La Conferencia se llevará a cabo en el hotel Omni at the Colonnade en San Antonio. Las oradoras especiales incluyen a Esther Quiñones de Garland; Noemí Vera de San José, California; Elizabeth Márquez de Puebla, Puebla, México; y Liliana Lewis de Austin.

El campamento de jóvenes Youth Week @ Alto Frio se tendrá el 4 al 8 de agosto en Leakey. El lema es “I Will Not Be Silent” (No Callaré), basado en I de Reyes 18:21. El campamento es para estudiantes que han completado el sexto grado, hasta el duodécimo grado. El evangelista del campamento será el Pastor Loui Canchola de McAllen. Otras personalidades son: la banda de Sammy Ramos de Fort Worth; el equipo de drama The Skitiots de Houston; Melvin Adams de Houston, anteriormente de los famosos Harlem Globetrotters; y el titiritero Ron Johnson de Carolina del Norte.

La segunda Conferencia Cristiana para Matrimonios está programada para el 12 y 13 de septiembre en el hotel DFW Marriott en Irving. El lema es “Corazones Unidos”, basado en Mateo 19:5. El orador principal será Rudy Kish de la Sección de Español de Enfoque A La Familia (Focus On The Family).

Se está planificando la segunda conferencia Hombres de Impacto para el 17 y 18 de octubre en el campamento Mount Lebanon en Cedar Hill. Se ha escogido el lema “Hombre Nuevo, ¿Mito o Realidad?, basado en II Corintios 5:17. El invitado especial es Daniel Catarisano de la Sección de Español de Enfoque A La Familia.

El primer campamento para los adultos solteros hispanos se está planificando para el 3 y 4 de octubre en Lake Pointe Church, Town East Campus, en Mesquite.

Para más información sobre cualquiera de estos eventos, por favor llame gratuitamente a Philip Levant al 1.877.953.7282, extensión 316.

First person: ethical evangelism

“Relevance” and “contextualization” are buzzwords in evangelism circles today. Relevance is the term employed when referring to effectiveness. In today’s evangelism world, if one is not effective in reaching the lost, they are said to be not relevant, or irrelevant.

Simply, contextualization refers to communicating the gospel in terms appropriate and understandable to the audience. For example, I would expect those who teach our church’s empty-nesters to present the gospel differently than those who teach third-graders.

I believe much good has come from discussing these two issues. But I also believe much harm is done to the kingdom in the name of contextualization and relevance.

Remember, in one sermon Jesus’ audience shrunk from 20,000 to 12. Must we conclude that Jesus’ ministry was “irrelevant”? We are better left to conclude that we cannot measure relevance by numbers.

Yet in today’s church culture, numbers are everything. An American church is considered relevant when there are lots of bodies in the worship center and irrelevant when there are not. This logic has harmed the kingdom. But before I explain what I mean, let me briefly discuss contextualization.

If contextualization is communicating the gospel understandably, how does one evaluate how competent they are at contextualization? If I stand in front of 2,000 people and present the gospel, how do I know if I what I said was clear to them?

Ironically, the de facto measuring stick of contextualization by American churches is numerical results.
Often, someone who receives a sizeable response when presenting the gospel is considered a leader in gospel contextualization. But such thinking is problematic.

If contextualization is measured by numbers, eventually and inevitably the content of the gospel message will be edited and censored to cause more people to “respond.” The biblical standard of salvation will adjust downward, which seems apparent in American churches today.

The gospel is often presented as an equitable contract between the lost person and God. “If you will turn to Jesus, he will be your friend.” “If you will invite Jesus into your heart, he will provide for you.”

We sell the gospel to people based on what they will get from God in this life, which in turn means their motive for turning to Christ is the impending blessings of God. American churches have walked themselves into the buzz saw of numerical results-driven ministry. Misguided measuring sticks are driving the discussions.

What we need is a wakeup call. We are doing much damage to the kingdom of God. We are telling people who have not reached the biblical standard of salvation that they are saved. We are telling lost people, whom we have pronounced redeemed, that they can be decision-making members within our congregations. We are leading people, who have no intention of making personal sacrifices for the sake of the kingdom, to believe they are in good standing with God. We are baptizing people who have no intention of choosing the Lord Jesus’ will over their own.

In short, we have reached a day in American churches where we have given ourselves the authority to adjust the biblical standard of salvation, and we are reaping what we’ve sown. Most of the churches that do recognize the problem are trying to “program” their way to a healthier state.

However, the problem cannot be fixed through leadership style, church structure or programming. The problem can only be fixed at the point of entry into the kingdom of God?salvation.

If we will return to the biblical standard of salvation the ship can still be righted. Our churches will regain spiritual health.

American churches, including mine, must return to the biblical standard of salvation.

Jesus provides the standard of salvation in his sermon recorded in Luke 14:25-35. The premise of the passage is that a decision as significant as becoming a follower of Christ should not be made without first considering the cost involved.

The decision should not be made emotionally or frivolously, but with serious consideration given to the price that one might have to pay for the sake of the kingdom.

Christ preached this sermon to lost people. While in their lost state they were to consider the price to be paid and if they were unwilling to pay such a price, they were not ready to be saved.

Jesus also modeled this kind of evangelism for us in Luke 18:18 with the story of the Rich Young Ruler. When the lost man indicated his reluctance to obey Jesus, the Lord deemed him unready for salvation.

Jesus’ example is the biblical standard of salvation. This is the standard a New Testament church must maintain in her efforts to win the lost?even if numerical success is the price paid for faithfulness to the Scripture.

It’s time for American churches to return to what I call ethical evangelism.

First, we must maintain the biblical standard of salvation regardless of perceived relevance or context. To lower the standard is to disobey the Lord’s commission to the church.

Second, we must stop telling people who fall short of the standard that they are saved. Let our churches be forthright in our message so that the lost may know where they stand before God. Only then will they understand the high calling of the gospel.

If churches are effective in ethical evangelism, then the numbers will seem irrelevant.

?Nathan Lino serves as the first vice president of the Southern Baptists of Texas Convention and is pastor of Northeast Houston Baptist Church in Humble.

Fort Worth church group spends spring break in New Orleans

FORT WORTH?One-hundred-and-six members of Glenview Baptist Church in Fort Worth spent spring break in New Orleans, laying floors and sheetrock for needy families and offering practical gifts in Jesus’ name.

The group of 55 adults, 38 youth, and 13 children left March 15 and headed to New Orleans.

“Our main three goals for our trip this year were to involve the body and teach our people about missions, intentionally cross-generationalize our congregation in order that our church body would become more unified, and that parents and children would build healthier relationships with one another,” said youth minister Bill Bray.

This year’s participants spanned from 7 years old to 69 years old. Over the week, the children passed out lunches and “Sacks of Love” and witnessed to about 300 homeless people and those living in housing projects.

Three of the crews, made up of adults and teenagers, laid floors for three Habitat for Humanity homes, and three more crews sheetrocked a 2,500 square-foot house and completely sheetrocked another home.

“It is exciting to see parents and children accomplishing the work that God has set out before us during that week. I encouraged all of our children to begin thinking more and more like missionaries and by the end of the week, they were doing just that,” said Zach Zettler, children’s minister.

“It is exciting to see how we can be used by God on a day-to-day basis,” one team member said.

Ben Stein’s “Expelled”: The Difference It Will Make

Ben Stein’s new movie “Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed” opens this weekend in theaters. It explores the widespread persecution?destruction of livelihoods, careers, and reputations?of scientists who doubt Darwin’s theory of evolution and think intelligence is needed to explain life’s origin and development.

Controversy surrounds this film. Reviews tend to be extremely positive or extremely negative. Who likes it? People who think God may have had something to do with our being here and therefore find it reasonable that God may have left tangible evidence of his involvement in creation. Who hates it? A scientific, educational, and media elite who prefer that God had nothing to do with it and think that nature must do all its own creating.

Who’s right? That’s the wrong question. Anyone who has studied the history of science knows about “the pessimistic induction.” The pessimistic induction says that all scientific theories of the past have to varying degrees been wrong and required modification (some were so wrong that they had to be abandoned outright). No scientific theory is written in stone. No scientific theory should be venerated. Every scientific theory should now and again be subjected to severe scrutiny. This is healthy for science.

“Expelled,” by contrast, points up the unhealthy state of contemporary science regarding biological origins. Our intellectual elites have insulated Darwinian evolution from scientific scrutiny. Moreover, they have institutionalized intolerance to any criticism of it. “Expelled” documents this institutionalized intolerance and thereby unmasks the hypocrisy of an intellectual class that pretends to value freedom of thought and expression, but undercuts it whenever it conflicts with their deeply held secular ideals.

Spotlighting yet another sin of society is all fine and well. Happily, “Expelled” also suggests a way forward in the debate over biological origins. The most surprising thing viewers learn from watching the film is the flimsiness of the scientific evidence for thinking life can be explained apart from a designing intelligence?the other side’s rhetoric notwithstanding. Take Jeffrey Kluger’s review of “Expelled” for TIME magazine:

“He [Stein] makes all the usual mistakes nonscientists make whenever they try to take down evolution, asking, for example, how something as complex as a living cell could have possibly arisen whole from the earth’s primordial soup. The answer is it couldn’t?and it didn’t. Organic chemicals needed eons of stirring and slow cooking before they could produce compounds that could begin to lead to a living thing.”

Come again? Take some organic chemicals, slow cook them, give enough time, and out pops life? This isn’t a scientific theory. This is an article of speculative faith.

In “Expelled,” Stein interviews atheistic scientist after atheistic scientist, and they all admit that they haven’t a clue how life arose. There is no materialistic theory of life’s origin, and anyone who suggests otherwise is bluffing. In creating conceptual space for intelligent design, Stein, and not the dogmatic defenders of Darwin, champions true freedom of thought and expression.

Will the movie succeed in opening up discussion about evolution and intelligent design? Here we need to be realistic. As Thomas Kuhn, in his book “Structure of Scientific Revolutions,” has clearly documented, those who support the status quo rarely change their views (and Darwinism is the status quo). Or, as Kuhn puts it, a new scientific paradigm (in this case intelligent design) succeeds on the graves of the old guard. Don’t expect the scientific community and intellectual elites to turn to intelligent design in response to this film. If anything, expect a backlash.

But that’s okay. The unwashed masses, in which I place myself, will love the film. Ordinary people, who often pay the Darwinists’ salaries through their tax dollars, will rightly be incensed. They’ll see that enough is enough: They will no longer be bullied by a Richard Dawkins, who tells them that if they don’t ascribe to Darwinian evolution, they’re either stupid, wicked, ignorant, or insane. They will start demanding that evolution be taught honestly?warts and all. And young people will be encouraged to take up careers in science to restore its health and integrity.

The movie’s impact will be felt immediately. But its long-term impact will be even greater. The film opens with documentary footage of the Berlin Wall going up and closes with it coming down. The day Darwinism and intelligent design can be fairly discussed without fear of reprisal represents the removal of a barrier even greater than the Berlin Wall. When future intellectual historians describe the key events that led to the fall of “Darwin’s Wall,” Ben Stein’s “Expelled” will top the list.

TRONG>?William A. Dembski is research professor of philosophy at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary and a leading intelligent design theorist whose books include “The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities,” and “The Design Revolution: Answering the Toughest Questions about Intelligent Design.” He is a senior fellow with Seattle’s Discovery Institute. His blog is found at uncommondescent.com.

Criswell trustees lay to rest rumor of SWBTS alliance

DALLAS: A rumor that Criswell College, started in 1975 by First Baptist Church of Dallas, would become part of nearby Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary was laid to rest by the college’s trustees during their regularly scheduled board meeting April 10.

As the college and the church continue to discuss their future relationship, some had suggested that Criswell College might become part of the seminary’s undergraduate program. That was apparently the motivation for the Criswell College trustees’ vote, which was without dissent, that the college would not become part of the seminary in the future.

Criswell President Jerry Johnson expressed optimism regarding the future of the college in a statement released to the Southern Baptist TEXAN.

“It’s exciting that Criswell College has developed so that we’re discussing our next step of growth. We are looking forward to the ways God will continue to use Criswell College to train men and women for kingdom ministry.”

In other business, the trustees approved the promotion of three faculty to the rank of associate professor: Chauncey Everett Berry, Dennis Ray Burk, and Joseph D. Wooddell. All three hold earned doctorates.

Also, the board granted the recommendation of an honorary doctorate to Dr. E. David Cook.