Month: February 2009

Malakoff church donates pews for damaged church at providential time

GALVESTON?Hurricane Ike took its toll on Cove Baptist Church in Orange last September, with the church sitting in the epicenter of the storm.

So when the First Baptist Church in the East Texas town of Malakoff saw fit to donate its church pews to Cove Baptist, its gift was well received and much needed.

In what FBC Malakoff Pastor Nathan Lorick said was providential timing, the church was in the midst of a building project late last year and trying to add some needed space in their church auditorium. In the construction phase of the project they were in the process of replacing their church pews with individual sanctuary chairs, and hoped to find a congregation in need of their wooden pews when they came across Cove Baptist Church.

Lorick said his church met in a tent outside its normal facilities while the auditorium was being completed when his church decided to give its pews to Cove Baptist.

“God has blessed First Baptist Church Malakoff by allowing us to be a blessing to another church. It is our desire to see God move in awesome ways through FBC and Cove Baptist Church as we strive to change the world together,” Lorick said. “We consider it a great joy to be able to help another church during a time of need.”

The congregation of Cove Baptist also noted God’s providential blessing amid the crisis as they saw the Lord meet innumerable needs in the weeks following Ike.

John Marshall, a pastor at Cove Baptist Church, said that while the church facilities were still structurally sound in the aftermath of Ike, the pews and interior items were completely destroyed as they were flooded with over five feet of water. Also lost in the hurricane’s wake was the church organ and grand piano.

Marshall remarked that the very week that his church prayed for new pews to replace the ones that were destroyed by the floodwater, FBC Malakoff called with the offer to ship their pews to Orange. Marshall said God’s provision in this period of rebuilding has been nothing less than remarkable and has resulted in a renewed sense of God’s presence and purpose in the day-to-day affairs of his congregation.


Moreover, he said Ike’s destruction has sparked something akin to a revival in his congregation, even resulting in the salvation of a young person in the youth ministry. Marshall said the high school ministry is meeting in the kitchen facilities of Cove Baptist Church due to the enormous flooding the meeting hall endured, but the ministry has gone on.

SBTC offers financial guidance for churches, members

GRAPEVINE?For churches and individuals struggling with debt and other financial needs in the current economic climate, the SBTC offers written and personal assistance.

The convention’s Church Ministries department is the primary provider of financial consultation. Bob Eklund of Eklund Stewardship Ministries serves as the SBTC’s financial ministry consultant. Eklund has written a workbook (with a teacher’s guide) called “Children of Privilege,” which teaches Christians the responsibility that accompanies the relative wealth American believers enjoy. The book also helps lead churches to better financial health.

Additionally, Eklund offers financial freedom training in a one-day, four-hour seminar designed to help individuals manage money and free themselves to be good stewards of what has given them. A resource titled “God’s Plan for Financial Freedom” helps seminar participants understand God’s principles for handling money.

Eklund Stewardship Ministries can also help churches in fundraising and debt retirement efforts.

The SBTC Foundation also offers help to churches and individuals in building trusts and endowments for kingdom causes through planned gifts from appreciated assets and estates. Foundation Executive Director Johnathan Gray teaches a “Christian Estate Planning” seminar for SBTC churches at no cost. Gray can visit privately with those individuals needing additional consultation or desiring to make a gift to the Lord’s work.

Contact Bob Eklund at 817-268-0560. Johnathan Gray may be reached at 817-552-2500.

ANNIE ARMSTRONG EASTER OFFERING: Willie and Ozzie Jacobs share Christ in Memphis Delta regions

MEMPHIS, Tenn.?Six people were found shot and stabbed to death in a mass murder in Memphis’ dangerous Binghamton neighborhood. Three children who survived the attack were hospitalized in critical condition.

And before the dead bodies were cold, yet another shooting and robbery took place in the same gang- and drug-plagued Binghamton area, located just six miles from downtown Memphis.

Southern Baptist missionaries Willie and Ozzie Jacobs Jr.?believing it will take no less than Jesus Christ to once and for all change the crime-culture of Memphis and stop such senseless neighborhood violence and bloodshed?have taken on the challenge.

Although now in their early 60s and married for 41 years, the couple is not ready for matching rocking chairs and simply waiting on monthly Social Security checks. They are on a mission from God in one of the perennial “Top Ten” most dangerous cities in the United States.

“Memphis is in the middle of spiritual warfare,” Jacobs remarked when asked about the spiritual climate of Tennessee’s youngest but second-largest metro area. “We’re dealing with murder, crime and drugs throughout the city. There’s a racial divide that has plagued Memphis since the days of Dr. Martin Luther King. It’s never healed. There’s also an economic and a political divide. In the middle of all this, we try to do ministry.”

And as if ministry in Memphis was not challenging enough, Jacobs serves the North American Mission Board?in partnership with the Tennessee Baptist Convention and the Mid-South Baptist Association?as regional coordinator of church planting for the four-state Memphis Delta Region, including parts of Tennessee, Mississippi, Arkansas and Missouri.

The Jacobses are two of 5,500 missionaries in the United States, Canada and their territories supported by the Annie Armstrong Easter Offering for North American Missions. They are among the NAMB missionaries featured as part of the annual Week of Prayer, March 1-8. This year’s theme is “Live with Urgency: Sowing Together for Harvest.” The 2009 Annie Armstrong Easter Offering’s goal is $65 million, 100 percent of which benefits missionaries like the Jacobses.

Willie and Ozzie (pronounced “O-zie”) didn’t have to transfer to Memphis last July. They were quite happy and content in Columbus, Ohio, where Willie was serving as a church planting strategist for the State Convention of Baptists in Ohio. Before that, he spent 30 years as a full-time pastor?20 years at a single church?in the Dallas area. Both Alabama natives, they now live in nearby Collierville, Tenn., and have three grown daughters and two grandchildren.

“For 40 years, we dreamed of the day when we’d become missionaries going to Africa,” he said. “But God allowed the mission field to come to us, after years of experience as a pastor in Texas.

“We came to Memphis because we sensed the lostness and spiritual climate of Memphis. We felt the Lord wanted us to come here and make an impact in new and innovative ways. This is a God-sized job here in Memphis when you look at the enormous responsibility we’ve been given as national missionaries.” He said sometimes it’s almost overwhelming.

Jacobs has launched a multi-pronged strategy for the Memphis area. He does his best to work along aside other predominantly African-American denominations?strong in Memphis?such as the Church of God in Christ (COGIC) and the National Baptist Convention, although “their concept of missions is quite different from ours as Southern Baptists,” Jacobs admitted.

“One of the biggest challenges we face among Southern Baptist churches is to help people change their mindsets about how ministry is done. The churches need to learn new approaches in order to reach people with the gospel, and do it in such a way that’s non-threatening. You have to build relationships,” Jacobs said.

“There’s a real need for churches to realize that ministry takes place on the outside and that a lot of the needs of people are going unmet because church members and fellowships are not going out.”

The greater Memphis area has a population of 1.2 million, making the city Tennessee’s second-largest metropolitan area behind <st1

Ike-damaged church flourishes with help from Virginians

When you pass through the waters, I will be with you; and through the

rivers, they will not overflow you. (Isaiah 43:2a)

SAN LEON?In the middle of this storm-ravaged community still struggling to overcome the devastation of Hurricane Ike stands a lighthouse. And the beacon of San Leon Community Church is burning brighter because of the help of Virginians from Thomas Road Baptist Church and God’s Pit Crew.

“We pray this will be a place where your name is lifted up and souls saved because you have raised up this church as a lighthouse,” prayed Jonathan Falwell, pastor of Thomas Road Baptist Church, Lynchburg, Va., in an invocation dedicating the newly remodeled church on Jan. 30.

Even before the floodwaters rose last Sept. 13, the members of San Leon Community Church had begun reaching out to this seaside town known for being rough around the edges. There were Friday morning food distributions, Thursday evening meetings of a Christ-centered 12-step program, and lots of door knocking. One congregant said after the storm everyone knew to come to this little chapel with their supplies and their needs.

As soon as local officials allowed residents to return to their homes?there were many who rode out the storm and found themselves desperate for help?the few dozen members of San Leon Community Church led by their pastor, Bob Gibson, stationed themselves in front of the church on the corner of FM 646 and Ave. H handing out ice, water, food, and buckets filled with cleaning supplies. With the help of out-of-work shrimpers and locals from the Vietnamese community, Friday morning food distributions resumed.

Many in this congregation had flooded homes, some losing everything. And yet this fellowship made the needs of their neighbors their priority.

GOD PROVIDED

No matter the need, Gibson and church members testified to the provision of God in the weeks following the storm. Church secretary Dana Poole said one day the volunteers were told some elderly people needed special incontinence supplies. The church ministry had been able to distribute a wide variety of supplies brought to their location by generous donors but this specific item was not among them. Poole said it was not 30 minutes after the request was made that an individual brought some donations, including the specific items needed.

James Kingcaid, a deacon, told of how a huge supply of cleaning buckets sent from a Mississippi church was quickly depleted.

“We were almost out. We had six left and a call came from a Presbyterian church in Temple. They brought 750 more,” he said. “That’s when you know you’re doing the will of God.”

Before all was said and done more than $2 million in supplies, food, water and ice were distributed to the residents of San Leon. And, that, Gibson said, was done with only $118 in the church’s bank account.

Meanwhile, the damaged church building had to wait. All that remained of the chapel was a gutted shell and brick veneer. The wood-frame parsonage was also stripped to the studs and bare floor. The Sunday School building which had stood on concrete stanchions had simply floated to the back of the lot as the waters of Galveston Bay covered this portion of San Leon eight feet high.

The church did not have flood insurance, Gibson said. It just was not something the tiny congregation could afford.

It was just three days after Hurricane Ike passed through that Randy Johnson and a team from “God’s Pit Crew,” a Danville, <st1:St

Houston pastors protest massive abortion clinic

HOUSTON–A diverse group of pastors gathered on the 36th anniversary of the Roe v. Wade decision to condemn renovation of a six-story Houston building into what they described as “the largest abortion clinic in the world.”
Some of those same pro-life advocates days later questioned the Houston City Council about monitoring the proposed Planned Parenthood facility to ensure compliance with local, state, and federal laws. Houston Mayor Bill White’s director of health and environmental policy, Elena Marks, is national chairwoman of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

Sonny Foraker, spokesman for the Greater Houston Area Pastor Council and pastor of First Baptist Church of Pearland, told the group of supporters and journalists, “We are standing here because [abortion] is a moral evil that destroys human life. We stand together as pastors to say this is not something we want in our community.”

The building, formerly the Sterling Bank at 4600 Gulf Freeway, loomed behind the pastors as they took turns on Jan. 22 speaking out against the new Planned Parenthood of Houston and Southeast Texas clinic. Planned Parenthood officials did not return repeated phone calls from the TEXAN for comment.

“This building is an invitation that gives everyone the message that it is OK to take life away,” said pastor Hernan Castano of Iglesia Rios de Aceite in Houston. “This cannot be the answer to the world. We must respect life.”

Melvin Johnson, pastor of Heart of Christ Community Church in the Houston suburb of Brazoria, called the Planned Parenthood facility an “abomination” and talked about the racist ideas of the organization’s founder, Margaret Sanger.

Johnson, who is black, held up pictures of Sanger participating in a Ku Klux Klan rally in the early 20th century. The summer 2008 issue of the Guttmacher Policy Review stated that black American women have five times as many abortions as their white counterparts.

“As Jesus died on the cross, he proclaimed life,” declared Carlos Martins, a Roman Catholic. “Any Christian should see the evil of this.”

Martins quoted Mother Teresa’s famous chastisement of America when she spoke at the 1994 National Prayer Breakfast in Washington, calling abortion “the greatest destroyer of peace in the world.”

Martins made it clear that the community of faith is not angry toward the women who seek and follow through with abortions but with organizations like Planned Parenthood that promote and conduct them. “There is a caring community that is willing to stand with and next to pregnant women. You do not go through this alone,” he said.

Noting that the Planned Parenthood site is just a few blocks from the University of Houston and historically African-American Texas Southern University, pastor James Clark of Park Place Baptist Church charged Planned Parenthood with targeting college students.

Foraker concurred: “This building is not by chance located here. I assure you, they are targeting our young people, African Americans and Hispanics,” he said.

Christine Melchor, executive director of Houston’s Coalition for Life, said the clinic would encompass 78,000 square feet–with one entire floor dedicated to abortions, including late-term abortions. She said she had reviewed building plans, permits and architectural drawings filed with the city of Houston.

“We’ve been following their expansion since 2006” when Planned Parenthood purchased the property, Melchor said, adding that she thought the most striking feature of the drawings is a planned ambulatory unit over the expanse of the third floor.

A Planned Parenthood clinic in downtown Houston performed late-term abortions until a state law was passed in 2003 to require that abortions conducted on women beyond 16 weeks of pregnancy be done in a center equipped with an ambulatory unit, which the clinic did not have.

Planned Parenthood clinics offer women a wide range of services, including pap tests, disease prevention and treatment, and birth control. Melchor acknowledged that the facility would be used for other these other services but added, “Planned Parenthood is all about abortions.”

Melchor said she suspects the clinic will be used to host international clients seeking abortions, especially late-term procedures. Dave Welch, director of the Houston pastors’ group, said he believes the new clinic could replace the notorious Wichita, Kan., clinic operated by George Tiller, who is on trial for violating state laws regulating the practice of late-term abortions.

Planned Parenthood came under scrutiny late last year following the release of a secretly video-taped encounter at an Indiana Planned Parenthood abortion clinic. The tape reveals a clinic employee manipulating the conversation with a supposedly 13-year-old girl. The girl, actually 20-year-old college student student Lila Rose, told the Planned Parenthood employee she was pregnant by her 31-year-old boyfriend, which, if true would constitute statutory rape.

By law the employee was required to report the case of sexual abuse to child protective services. Instead, the worker suppressed the information and convinced the girl to make up an alternative story.

The tape was produced by members of the pro-life Mona Lisa Project and distributed over the Internet. The Planned Parenthood clinic aide was ultimately fired, but not before national criticism arose concerning Planned Parenthood’s reporting practices and its servicing of minors.

It was that issue, along with questions regarding city regulations, which pro-life proponents brought before Houston City Council Jan. 27. They called into question the integrity of the abortion provider’s adherence to state regulations and asked Mayor Bill White and council members if they wanted Houston to be known as the home of “the largest abortion clinic in the hemisphere.”

Christine Kasper asked, in light of the Indiana violations, how the city of Houston would monitor the activities of the abortion clinic to ensure that Planned Parenthood complied with local and state laws.

Melchor was among those addressing the council. She asked if patients, prior to abortions, were tested for AIDS and other communicable diseases.

“How,” she asked, “will these babies be disposed of?”

Melchor later said her questions relate to the disposal of potentially bio-hazardous substances into the city sewage or waste disposal systems. There were no responses to the questions posed by the women.

Later in a phone interview, Melchor said the purpose of the questions before the council was to give them pause and to educate Houston citizens about the Planned Parenthood facility.

“Do they want to be known as the capital city of abortions?” she asked.

Melchor said she plans to ask more questions of the City Council. But she said she is dubious about getting an objective response because of Mayor White’s connection with Planned Parenthood’s national chairwoman.

Melchor asked White about the potential conflict of interest. He said he would respond at another time to her question.

Ironically, an animal-rights group attended the same meeting, demanding the city’s animal shelters stop the euthanizing of stray and unclaimed animals.

Supporters held signs as advocates spoke. Some wore T-shirts promoting the No Kill Advocacy Center whose policy, in part, states: “The No Kill Advocacy Center is the nation’s first organization dedicated solely to the promotion of a No Kill nation.”

Even if the city of Houston approves all the permits required to complete construction of the new abortion clinic, Foraker said area pastors, along with TexasFamilies.org, a coalition of pro-life organizations, plan to press contractors to disassociate themselves from the project. By asking church members, businesses and the community to stop doing business with Planned Parenthood contractors, they hope to bring enough pressure to force them to withdraw their services to Planned Parenthood.

At the beginning of the Jan. 22 gathering, David Fannin, pastor of suburban Nassau Bay Baptist Church, compared the 3,000 lives lost in the 9/11 terrorist attacks—and the country’s resolve afterward—to the 3,700 lives lost each day to abortion. Will the nation, he asked, steel itself with the same resolve as the massive Planned Parenthood clinic rises from the ground?

FIRST PERSON: Infertility journey was worth it

NASHVILLE, Tenn.  My 11-month-old son Graham is saying “da-da” now.

Actually, it’s more like “da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da,” and he rarely says it when looking at me, but I’m not complaining. I’m just enjoying the moment.

He says it when he’s going to sleep, when he’s waking up, when he’s playing. I’m not even sure he knows what it means, but that’s OK. Soon enough, he’ll figure it all out.

I’ve seen him grow a lot since that night he was born nearly one year ago, 38 minutes past midnight. I was there in the delivery room, holding my wife Julie’s hand, as together we stood on one side of the room and watched Graham take his first breath and voice his first cry.

You see, Graham isn’t our biological son. My wife and I adopted him the day after he was born, some nine months after Graham’s birth mother learned she was pregnant and wondered what she would do. Unable to provide for him?and unwilling to consider an abortion?she began exploring other options. That’s where we entered the picture.

We had had a strong desire to be parents but had struggled with three years of infertility, and the doctors couldn’t point to any one specific reason as to why. All of our friends, it seemed, were pregnant. Our low point emotionally came during the summer of 2007, when during a vacation to Maine we thought we finally might be expecting. For a few days, our sightseeing was a bit more exciting than usual. Our meals were more exciting, too. How crazy, I thought at the time, would it be to find out we were pregnant, more than a thousand miles from home?

Yet the day before our flight home, we learned we weren’t. We sat together on the edge of our hotel bed, held one another and cried. And sobbed.

Little did we know that at that very moment, our son had already been conceived here in the U.S., and was waiting?through the providential hand of God?for us to learn about him and his birth mom.

I don’t know all the reasons why God allowed us to walk through infertility, but I’m glad he did. If not for infertility, we wouldn’t have Graham. And Graham, even though his genes are different from mine, is the baby I always wanted. Why would I trade Graham?the son I love more than my own life?for a baby who has my own genes and my own blood?

My wife and I aren’t royalty, desiring to continue a pointless bloodline. Our citizenship is in heaven (Philippians 3:20), where bloodlines are meaningless anyway. Graham is our son, and we wouldn’t want it any other way. He is “our own.”

Last night, I gave Graham a bath. (Baths and bedtime are my responsibility in our house.) Graham and I did what we do every night: I ran the bath water, and he, still sitting on the floor in his diaper, excitedly pulled up on the edge of the tub (with help from me for safety), wanting to see the action. Once in the tub, we got the scrubbing and the cleaning out of the way early so that we would have time to play. On this night, he chewed on his favorite toy, a red plastic teething circle?he has five teeth with a sixth one coming through?and also splashed his little hands and arms in the water. I put my hand in the tub and splashed along with him, which may sound crazy to some moms, but Graham thinks it’s funny and I enjoy it. I then dried him off, put his long-sleeve blue pajamas on him and took him to his bedroom to help him wind down for bed.

Once in his room?and after he had said goodnight to Mommy?I read him a short story from his Bible toddler board book, which, as usual, he tried to grab and chew. (Keep in mind he’s only 11 months old.) Finally, I gave him his final bottle of the day, shared the gospel with him, told him that I loved him and that I was glad to be his Daddy and wouldn’t trade him for any baby in the world, kissed him and placed him gently in his crib.

Somewhere during all of that, he smiled and kissed me, too.

Thanks to the healing power of God?and a wonderful gift named Graham?I no longer have that burning desire to have biological children. If God gives us a biological child, I’d be thrilled, but if he doesn’t, that’s OK.

Sure, pregnancy and biological children are a wonderful blessing, but adoption is, too. After all, Scripture tells us that every believer was adopted by God (Romans 8:15, Ephesians 1:5).

During our battle with infertility, I remember pondering the same question that many infertile couples consider: Will I love an adopted child as much as I would a biological one? The simple answer was yes. In fact, we hope to adopt again in the near future.

Perhaps God took us through infertility to encourage other couples struggling with the same issue. Today’s

Ft. Worth couple advocates adoption in words, deed

FORT WORTH?Just mentioning the word “adoption” causes John Mark Yeats’ eyes to light up. Yeats, assistant professor of church history at Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, not only has four adopted children, but he and his wife, Angie, counsel potential adoptive parents and advocate adoption wherever they can.

The idea of adoption was a topic of discussion early on in their relationship.

“Before we got married, we had laid the expectation that we could have kids on the table and surrendered it to God,” Yeats said.

They agreed that even if they were able to have biological children, they would adopt at least one child. At that point, the Yeatses did not know that they would experience infertility.

Having seen a few families self-destruct when faced with infertility, Yeats considers this kind of surrender “an important thing because a lot of times we think it’s a right that we have kids.”

Having difficulty getting pregnant early in their marriage, the Yeatses experienced feelings of inadequacy. Some wondered what was “wrong,” since they adopted children instead of having them biologically.

“Many people want a sense of biological succession,” Yeats said. Angie admits that she had difficulty with it as well, wanting to be able to bring the baby home from the hospital.

Angie said she prayed, “I’d just like to know one way or the other whether we should adopt.”

After a complicated tubular pregnancy that ended in surgery, doctors told them in-vitro fertilization was their only option for getting pregnant, but they did not consider this an ethical option. Through these events and continued prayer, they realized that God wanted them to adopt and began the process. Less than a year later, they brought their first daughter, Briley, home and finalized the adoption.

When they moved to Texas and Yeats joined Southwestern Seminary as a professor a couple of years later, they felt like the Lord was leading them to adopt again. During a meeting with Hope Cottage, a Texas-based pregnancy and adoption center, Yeats asked, “Do you ever get sibling groups?”

With a stunned look in her eye, the representative said, “We never have people ask that question, and we never have sibling groups, but we just got our first.”

Six weeks later, Cadie, an infant at the time, came home with them, and then six months after that, they adopted Sean, her biological brother who was a year older.

In 2007, they received a phone call from Hope Cottage informing them that Sean and Cadie’s birth mother had recently given birth to another child. Although they thought they were finished adopting children, they surrendered themselves in prayer again.

Yeats recalls, “The overarching issue was asking, ‘Where will this child be in 15 years?’ We have a responsibility as believers on some level to bring him into a godly home.”

A couple of months later, they welcomed Jackson into their home, and the adoption was finalized in June.

The Yeats family has also had to work through the challenges associated with transracial adoption, especially misperceptions from people they meet. They’ve endured all of the random questions and false assumptions, but they see them as opportunities to educate people about adoption.

Even their children have begun to notice a difference in skin color from Mom and Dad.

“As Briley has gone to school, it is interesting to hear her talk about kids ‘with skin like mine’ and those who have ‘skin like yours,'” Yeats said.

“We have always used age-appropriate terms and concepts to reinforce positive values of their heritage. One of our kids’ favorite picture books is a book by Sandra Pinkney called “Shades of Black.” The book talks about the variances in skin color, hair textures, and the things that make each person unique.

“We have to work to make sure that we, as parents, stay up on aspects of a culture that is foreign to us so that our children can engage in the history and heritage of their own ethnic identity,” Yeats said. “Most of all, we pray that our kids will find their true identity in Christ, which supersedes all earthly divisions.

“We are careful to try and place our children in arenas where they have exposure to people from all over the world. We also have close friendships with families who have also adopted transracially.”

The Lord has blessed the Yeats family with a church that includes several families who chose adoption. Several children in their kids’ Sunday School classes are adopted and reflect a variety of ethnicities.

<P class=MsoNormal style

Sermon-based small groups foster effective discipleship, speaker says

Pastors and church leaders attending a small groups seminar at the SBTC offices in Grapevine on Jan. 13 were encouraged to reinforce expository preaching with sermon-based small groups.

Presenter Alan Stoddard, executive pastor at Cornerstone Baptist Church in Arlington who is doing doctoral research on sermon-based small group (SBSG) ministry, said the approach revisits the “big idea” of a pastor’s sermon, it revisits Scripture and clarifies the text, and it reinforces application of the text.

Moreover, Stoddard said, the SBSG approach is biblical.

“Even Jesus used this as one of his teaching techniques to reinforce what he taught because [his disciples] didn’t get it,” Stoddard explained, referring to Jesus’ explanation of the parable of the sower with his followers as recorded in Luke 8.

Stoddard said many churches have no way to gauge the discipleship effectiveness of their church’s ministry, and small groups make that easier to do.

“We are to teach people to do {discipleship],” Stoddard remarked. “Who’s monitoring the doing? Is your church’s delivery system set up to know where people are spiritually?

“Too many churches find out where their members are spiritually on the back end and not on the front end.”

Small group ministry provides the potential for deeper, more intimate friendships often in a home setting where people may feel more relaxed.

Many churches deliver sound, biblical content, but don’t facilitate relationship-building very well, Stoddard commented.

“Content devoid of relationship building is insufficient. It’s relationships that shut the back door of the church. The people who fall out are those without any vital connections.”

Stoddard said good, expository preaching makes possible deeper discussions in small group settings, but if you’re a pastor “and you wing it and you don’t really study, this isn’t going to work. Your preaching has to be good.”

Stoddard asked the pastors attending: “What are people doing today with your message? They’ve probably forgotten it.”

SBSG’s allow the Sunday sermon to resurface in a discussion-driven environment where most transformation takes place, Stoddard said.

“If you are a campus church, you are cutting some of your people off from discipleship by not creating living room opportunities,” Stoddard stated. “On the other hand, some people are not ready for being in a group under 12 people.”

Because of this, churches with traditional Sunday School should not take an either/or approach, he said.


For more information on the SBSG approach, contact Kenneth Priest toll-free at 877-953-7282 (SBTC) or e-mail him at kpriest@sbtexas.com.

Let free scientific inquiry prevail in classrooms

Leave it to the “experts” instead of “scientifically illiterate” elected officials to decide what constitutes legitimate science education for your kids.

That’s the message the New York Times editorial board and Darwinist advocacy groups want recorded as the moral of the story after the Texas State Board of Education last week caused the scientific establishment to smile and then frown in the course of one very influential, closely watched board meeting. (See related story, page 1)

It was a net win for friends of honest scientific inquiry?albeit a tentative one that will be challenged fiercely before the final vote to ratify the new standards during meetings March 26-27.

In the meantime, however, the Texas education board ought to be applauded for its initial approval of language that requires students to “evaluate the sufficiency or insufficiency of common ancestry” as it relates to the fossil record and to “assess the arguments for and against universal common descent in light of this fossil evidence.”

The board, in its once-a-decade review of science curricula and standards, acted after a public hearing and advice from a panel of mostly Darwinist scientists and educators to drop a 20-year-old state requirement that students evaluate the “strengths and weaknesses” of all scientific theories, which it did in a close vote.

After that vote, however, the board astounded the evolution-as-inviolable-truth crowd, allowing amendments that included the “arguments for and against” language directed at key evolutionary tenets of biology.

Between now and March, activists opposed to critiquing evolution have promised to fight to remove the new amendments. Those who are committed to free academic inquiry should also join the battle by thoughtfully explaining why Darwinism deserves scrutiny as much as any other theory that involves conjecture about things that cannot be tested in a laboratory.

The Texas Freedom Network, which bills itself as “a mainstream voice to counter the religious right” but is rarely mainstream, is among those that has vowed to fight the new amendments.

The network’s president, Kathy Miller, likened the amendment to allow critique of common ancestry to a “Hail, Mary” football pass that would be called back on further review, adding that the amendment “could provide a small foothold for teaching creationist ideas and dumbing down biology instruction in Texas.”

Of course, no reasonable person?creationist or not?wants biblical creationism taught in public school science classes. In a pluralistic culture, even elective Bible classes are not without danger. Moreover, I don’t want a public school teacher explaining Genesis to my kids. You wouldn’t either.

What’s more, I want my kids, who attend Texas public schools, to know evolutionary theory backwards and forwards. I’m not afraid of them learning what is the consensus of the scientific establishment, but that same establishment is terrified of students learning that Darwinism and neo-Darwinism might not be foolproof.

Miller’s claim that criticisms of evolution are part of a Trojan horse strategy for introducing sectarian religion into public schools is the rallying cry in this fight, and it couldn’t be more absurd.

The tact of the evolution-as-inviolable-truth crowd is to cry wolf about a theocratic conspiracy of Christian fundamentalists who want six-day Genesis creation crammed down the throat of every school kid?Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Hindu, secular, you name it.

Related to that is the clever move of evolution proponents to equate biblical creationism?a religious viewpoint?with intelligent design (ID) theory?a scientific investigation into the apparent design in the known universe and in living things.

ID proponents are a varied lot?from secular Jews such as philosopher David Berlinski to Roman Catholics like biochemist Michael Behe and Christian evangelicals like mathematician and philosopher William Dembski of Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary and Guillermo Gonzalez, an acclaimed astronomer whose research has been covered in respected journals such as Nature and Science.

In closing its editorial about the Texas school board, the New York Times wrote: “The lesson we draw from these shenanigans is that scientifically illiterate boards of education should leave the curriculum to educators and scientists who know what constitutes a sound education.”

When the arguments for free academic inquiry encroach on Darwinism’s place as the great meta-narrative of human history and existence, Darwin’s defenders resort to character attacks at the rate of bullets flying from an automatic rifle.

(One wonders if anyone on the Times’ editorial board has ever bothered to read Dembski or Berlinski or Gonzalez.)

<SPAN style="; FONT-FAMILY: 'Trebuchet MS'; mso-fareast-font-family: Cambria; mso-bidi-font-family: 'Times New Roman'

The SBTC’s ’09 legislative agenda

As the 81st Texas Legislature gets underway, important deliberations affecting Texas families will take place every day. While most news stories and politicians will focus on pragmatic issues such as taxation, a variety of moral issues will also arise. Moral issues have a practical aspect, to be sure. That is sometimes the problem. The profit motive is the only reason that some issues, laws regarding local option liquor elections, gambling, and so forth, even come to a state legislature. Our role is to be more heavenly minded than that. We can direct the debate toward “should” questions rather than just “can” questions.

God’s people in a free country have a responsibility to ensure that governments help rather than hinder the crucial institutions of our society. Your church is on point as these matters arise at the local level. Your state convention works to influence those men and women who govern Texas.

Our convention has a standing committee that oversees our work on public policy issues. The Texas Ethics and Religious Liberty Committee’s work is governed by these principles:

?Where the convention has spoken, the committee is free to express that opinion in the public forum. Convention resolutions, our constitution, and our statement of faith provide a selection of opinions convention messengers have expressed. The committee is basically quoting the convention messengers on these issues. Our committee and legislative consultant do not speak to the convention in an effort to pull the churches in one direction or another. Those people only say what you’ve said.

?The TERLC works on the assumption that we cannot effectively rise to every issue. If SBTC representatives express an opinion on every matter addressed in a bill, our voice becomes background noise. Each year, we choose a few issues that are most crucial and likely to come up in proposed legislation. Even important issues where there is nothing close to a consensus within our convention will not appear on our agenda. That’s why you don’t see us fighting for or against a particular tax or energy plan.

?Our churches and people cannot rally for every issue under discussion. We also don’t have an extensive staff to work full time in Austin. Our convention puts its priority elsewhere. The convention’s work in public policy will be more effective if we use our moral voice in a prioritized manner.

?We also work on the assumption that no party is reliably on God’s side. Politics is a business of pragmatics. Ethical issues are often more absolute than the thinking of politicians. In a conservative state like ours we are often reminded that assumptions about Democrats and Republicans formed by reading the national news do not always apply. While one party might be more often with us on one issue, the other will agree with us on another. The line between right and left in Texas is more blurred and located far to the right of that same line in Washington D.C.

The SBTC has employed a consultant to work with us in Austin during the legislative session. He tracks bills, makes suggestions as to the best way we might express our opinions, and passes on whatever message we give him.

After discussing the current session with our consultant, the TERLC has come up with the following items for our legislative agenda for this year:

1. Marriage and family. The constitutional referendum of 2006 pretty well settled (for Texas) the definition of family. Homosexual marriage has never been the biggest problem faced by the American family. Marriage is a devastated institution because of divorce and unfaithfulness. Initiatives such as covenant marriage can provide some encouragement to highlighting the significance of marriage to our culture. At the very least, government at all levels can be directed to do no harm to families.

2. Life issues. These will always come up because there is money in abortion. Last session saw efforts to work around parental consent, and an attempt to impose draconian penalties on not-for-profit pro-life counseling centers. Embryonic stem cell research is also always of interest to some lobbyist or another. We may see places where our voice can be applied to hold the line or better our position where the law is pro-life, or resist new pro-abortion laws.

3. Gambling. Again there’s money to be made, although there is much confusion regarding who’s going to actually make money. Our last session saw bills intended to legalize casinos, legalize thousands of gambling machines at already existing horse and dog tracks, redefine certain kinds of gambling so that it’s not called gambling, and to privatize the state lottery. If every one of these initiatives pass this year (they won’t), our next session will have to address bills intended to relieve casinos and gambling establishments of some of their tax burden. Pro-gambling bills will come up every session in the same old way and we will fight them every session in the same old way.

4. Freedom of religion. The rights of churches and individuals may be threatened by unconstitutional repression of the free speech of students, whether in prayer or in witnessing.
Churches may face challenges to free expression and tax-exempt status. These issues have arisen more frequently in local laws, but state government may have a role in upholding these rights. Laws that affect religious freedom will always be of inter